I am still looking for good values, but actually 100% = 0.65-0.77 depends on spin direction (yes different acceleration in different spin direction ) and 0% = >3.2TheFrog4u wrote:It might be usefull to know which acceleration value is defined as beeig 100% and which 0% (I assume something like 0.6 to 2.0)?
BAD level is accX>1.6, accY>1.6, accZ>4.0, FAIL level is accX>3.2, accY>3.2, accZ>8.0 (all values in G)
I planning to made a Client Tab for propeller balancing, than it should be possible to calibrate the balancing much better and measure the acceleration of the motor without the propellers and use this as 100% value for next measures (with propellers).
I'm waiting for some feedback. Good to know were the values of the condition without the propellers from other users. I fear that there are significant quality differences in the motor production as well.bhuism wrote:Will you be doing a pull request on the official repo?
Here is a CF balancing self test FW with higher information level for that.
Code: Select all
SYS: Crazyflie is up and running!
SYS: Build 40+:601803a36702+ (tip) MODIFIED
SYS: I am 0x871443555456854966FFF50 and I have 128KB of flash!
IMU: MPU6050 I2C connection [OK].
IMU: HMC5883 I2C connection [OK].
IMU: MS5611 I2C connection [OK].
MPU6050: Self test [OK].
MPU6050: Propeller on M1 [OK] Condition: 102 percent
MPU6050: Propeller on M1 [OK]. X_max: 0.687, Y_max: 0.618, Z_max: 0.707
MPU6050: Propeller on M2 [OK] Condition: 102 percent
MPU6050: Propeller on M2 [OK]. X_max: 0.637, Y_max: 0.619, Z_max: 0.610
MPU6050: Propeller on M3 [OK] Condition: 101 percent
MPU6050: Propeller on M3 [OK]. X_max: 0.678, Y_max: 0.653, Z_max: 0.705
MPU6050: Propeller on M4 [OK] Condition: 100 percent
MPU6050: Propeller on M4 [OK]. X_max: 0.642, Y_max: 0.650, Z_max: 0.620
MPU6050: Propeller Balancing Self Test [OK]
HMC5883L: Self test [OK].
MS5611: Self test [OK].
Source code is on: Bitbucket Repo Link